{"id":532,"date":"2023-07-04T15:31:42","date_gmt":"2023-07-04T14:31:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/?p=532"},"modified":"2023-07-24T15:34:42","modified_gmt":"2023-07-24T14:34:42","slug":"the-case-filed-exchangers-co-ltd-for-an-injunction-etc-against-trademark-infringement-has-been-terminated-by-settlement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/the-case-filed-exchangers-co-ltd-for-an-injunction-etc-against-trademark-infringement-has-been-terminated-by-settlement\/","title":{"rendered":"The case filed Exchangers Co.,Ltd. for an injunction, etc. against trademark infringement has been terminated by settlement."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>GVE Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as &#8220;the Company&#8221;) (hereinafter referred to as &#8220;GVE&#8221;) as the plaintiff, and Exchangers Co.,Ltd. (&#8220;Exchangers&#8221;) as a defendant, has been terminated by settlement of the case (Tokyo District Court, 2021 (Wa) No. 12863).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this case, the defendant claimed that the use of another registered trademark &#8220;xcoin&#8221; (trademark registration number: No. 6254961) and the mark &#8220;EXcoin&#8221; in the name of electronic money and its transaction application issued by EXchangers infringed the trademark right owned by the Company (trademark registration number: No. 6088494, &#8220;EXcoin&#8221;). EXcoin.) The Company&#8217;s claim was accepted and the Tokyo District Court ruled that the trademark infringement had occurred, leading to the settlement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We have received several inquiries about the similarity between our &#8220;EXC&#8221; platform and &#8220;EXcoin&#8221; and the &#8220;xcoin&#8221; of Exchangers, which has caused some confusion. We apologize for the confusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We would like to inform you of the above.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>GVE Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as &#8220;the Company&#8221;) (hereinafter referred to as &#8220;GVE&#8221;) as the plaintiff, and Exchangers Co.,Ltd. (&#8220;Exchangers&#8221;) as a defendant, has been terminated by settlement of the case (Tokyo District Court, 2021 (Wa)&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-532","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","category-release"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/532"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=532"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/532\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":533,"href":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/532\/revisions\/533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=532"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=532"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gve.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=532"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}